Articles.

Elaborating upon a theme, that we have begun in the article “A practical example of the assessment’s results analysis from the perspective of Ayurveda”. We have at our disposal several assessments of one patient. This allows us to study the dynamics of his condition in detail.

For those who have just begun learning about “Vedapulse” with this article, we want to remind that the program includes both – HRV (heart rate variability) algorithms – method recognized by the modern academic medicine, and algorithms, resulted from the traditional Ayurveda pulse diagnosis’ techniques.

In the process of new users’ training, we have found that all of them make the same mistakes. Let’s consider them with the specific case study. This material should be read by all who have just purchased a hardware-software “VedaPulse” kit and makes the first steps in the device’s mastering. Let’s look backward over earlier mistakes.

Almost every new VedaPulse user asks: ‘What does your device exactly define – vikruti or prakruti?’ And when he receives the answer that the purpose of the device is the definition of VIKRUTI, expresses sincere bewilderment: ‘How can the recommendations be made without taking into account the PRAKRUTI?’

Our partner from Brazil – Dr. Mark Sircus has published another great article about practical use of VedaPulse and how its diagnostic capabilities helped him answer some confusing questions.

While developing algorithms for VedaPulse™ computer pulse diagnosis, I was using ideas of a famous Ayurvedic doctor in the West – founder of Ayurvedic Institute and Advisor to National Ayurvedic Medical Association of the USA – Dr. Vasant Lad. And recently I had a chance to meet him in person in his Institute’s headquarters in Albuquerque, NM and to demonstrate my device.